Monday, January 14, 2013

Stephen Ross and Government Subsidies


Stephen Ross and Government Subsidies

Last weekend I was showing a friend the Ross School’s building and saw the painting of Stephen Ross on the main floor.  A small plaque gave information about the painter and the subject.  I learned that Mr. Ross founded Related Companies, a real-estate investment company that began in 1972 with financing and developing government assisted housing.  The billionaire real-estate developer who gave $100 million to the University of Michigan’s Business School got his start using government subsidies.  I did some research and thought I would share a few things I found interesting.

Although Related Companies has expanded into areas that include fund management, hospitality, distressed property acquisition, and “the fitness and lifestyle arena”, it is still very much involved in “affordable housing”:

Affordable housing laid the foundation of Related Companies and we continue to place a high priority on developing, acquiring and preserving housing for this sector. In fact, over 60% of the 40,000 residential apartment homes under our management are part of one or more affordable housing programs, and an additional 20% of these homes provide workforce housing.

To date, Related has developed or acquired over 23,000 affordable housing units with a total value of approximately $3.5 billion. Currently, we have over 7,000 units under development or under contract throughout the country with a value in excess of $1.5 billion. [1]

What is affordable housing?  HUD’s definition is housing costs that do not exceed 30 percent of annual income.[2]  When Related Companies refers to affordable housing, it means housing development that has been subsidized by the government in order to provide housing that is affordable to lower income residents.  Those subsidies come in various forms, including favorable financing for the developers, or housing vouchers for the residents (commonly known as “Section 8” vouchers).

Not all housing in a development needs to be “affordable” in order for the development to qualify for subsidies.  For example, there is a obtain tax exempt financing through a program known at “80/20”.  Under 80/20 programs, when at least 20% of the rental units are set aside for low-income residents (those with incomes at 50% or less of the local Area Median Income or AMI), Low Income Housing Tax Credits are made available to the developer.  These credits can be syndicated or used to offset tax payments.  (LIHTCs are also called Section 42 credits because of the applicable section of the Internal Revenue Code.)

            The 80/20 program is a good deal for the low income residents who are able to get on the list, but it is an even better deal for developers.  In a 2011 article about 80/20 financing in The New York Times, the reporter wrote:  “without the incentives it affords, it would be all but impossible to build new large-scale rental buildings.”  [3]  Related says on its website that it “is one of the nation’s largest developers of 80/20 rental housing in New York City.”

LIHTCs are not inexpensive.  The Office of Tax Analysis of the U.S. Department of the Treasury estimates a ten-year revenue loss of $61 billion for the period of 2008-2017 resulting from these credits.[4]

            Why do I find it interesting that Ross started his business with government subsidies?  I don’t object to government encouraging desired behavior through tax incentives.  In fact, I think that our tax policy should be based in part on using incentives.  I find it interesting because of Ross’s politics.  In 2012 Ross donated $100,000 to the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future.  He also donated $20,800 to the Republican National Committee, $5,000 to Free and Strong America PAC, and $2,500 to Governor Romney’s campaign.[5] 

            After his loss in the presidential campaign, Governor Romney remarked on a conference call with donors that President Obama had won by “giving targeted groups a big gift.”  According to Governor Romney, these “gifts” included free contraceptives for college women and free health care for Hispanics.  How would he characterize $61 billion in low income housing tax credits?  Gifts for developers?  Or is something not a “gift” when the recipient can be labeled a “job creator”? 




[1] The Related Companies website, “Affordable Housing”, accessed January 6, 2013, http://www.related.com/ourcompany/businesses/9/Affordable-Housing/.

[2] HUD.gov, “Affordable Housing”, accessed January 13, 2013, http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/affordablehousing

[3] Santora, Marc, “Across the Hall, Diversity of Incomes”, New York Times, published September 2, 2011, accessed January 13, 2013. 

[4] The President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, The Report on Tax Reform Options:  Simplification, Compliance, and Corporate Taxation, August 2010, p.77.
[5] Fin’s Ross giving big to Romney, October 2, 2012, CBS Miami, accessed January 13, 2013 http://miami.cbslocal.com/2012/10/02/fins-ross-giving-big-to-romney/

No comments:

Post a Comment